Implementing RCS-Based Multi-Signature Approval Flows for High-Value NFT Transactions
multi-sigRCSDAO

Implementing RCS-Based Multi-Signature Approval Flows for High-Value NFT Transactions

ccrypts
2026-02-03
11 min read
Advertisement

A technical how‑to for integrating E2EE RCS confirmations into multi‑sig NFT signing workflows for teams and DAOs.

Hook: high-risk NFT deals need more than wallets — they need verifiable, secure human approvals

Teams, DAOs and custodians moving large-value NFTs face a concentrated set of risks: wallet compromise, social-engineered approvals, and ambiguous audit trails. Relying on email, SMS or unauthenticated chat to approve a six- or seven-figure transfer is a liability. This guide shows how to integrate end-to-end encrypted RCS confirmations into modern multi-signature signing workflows so that each human approval is cryptographically bound to the transaction, auditable, and resistant to account takeover or message spoofing.

Why RCS multi-sig matters in 2026

In late 2025 and early 2026 the messaging landscape shifted: GSMA's Universal Profile 3.0 and carrier implementations advanced support for richer, standardized RCS features, and major OS vendors signaled movement toward RCS end-to-end encryption (E2EE). Apple’s iOS betas and Android stacks began exposing E2EE-capable RCS flows that interoperated with the Messaging Layer Security (MLS) model used elsewhere. That change makes RCS a viable, secure channel for transaction confirmations — provided the integration is done correctly and with defense-in-depth.

For DAOs and teams, the advantage is operational: RCS provides a native, threaded, branded UI for confirmations (buttons, carousels, suggested replies) with better deliverability than third-party apps. For security, E2EE and device-bound attestations raise the bar against interception and spoofing. But the channel alone is not enough: you must cryptographically bind RCS messages to on-chain actions and the signer’s identity, harden the device, and design fallback and audit mechanisms.

High-level architecture

Below is a minimal, secure architecture that preserves privacy while supporting multi-sig approvals for high-value NFT transactions.

  1. Transaction Service (Backend): Prepares unsigned transaction payloads, computes canonical transaction digests, and orchestrates approval collection.
  2. RCS Messaging Gateway: Uses carrier/ vendor RBM APIs to deliver E2EE-capable RCS messages. For vendor-neutral E2EE leverage MLS-based flows where available; otherwise use vendor SDKs with device attestation.
  3. Signer Device (Wallet App): Holds signer private key or a device-bound signing keypair for attestation. Presents the RCS confirmation UI and locally signs the canonical digest once the user confirms.
  4. Signature Verification & Aggregation: Backend validates signatures, checks device attestation and signature counters, then either submits multisig signatures to the on-chain executor (e.g., Gnosis Safe) or instructs an HSM/TSS coordinator to produce the final threshold signature.
  5. Audit Vault: Securely stores signed approvals, RCS receipts and device attestations (encrypted at rest) for audits and tax recordkeeping.

Threat model (concise)

  • Adversary can attempt SIM swap or carrier account compromise.
  • Adversary may control an untrusted network node (MitM) but not end devices with valid device attestation.
  • Adversary may attempt replay of confirmations or build fraudulent message UI that looks legit.

Step-by-step integration guide

Below are the concrete steps to implement RCS-backed multi-sig approvals. The steps assume an EVM-chain NFT workflow, but the principles generalize.

1) Define policy and thresholds

Before you write code, the DAO or custodian needs a clear approval policy:

  • Approval threshold: e.g., 3-of-5 for transactions > $50k
  • High-value override: additional biometric/HSM confirmation for > $250k
  • Timeouts and expiry: approvals must be collected within N hours
  • Escalation: if a device fails attestation, route to backup signer

2) Canonicalize the transaction (compute digest)

To prevent UI manipulation and replay, you must bind a single canonical digest to every transaction. For EVM NFTs, a recommended digest is:

digest = keccak256( "RCS-V1" || chainId || contractAddress || tokenId || value || gas || recipient || nonce || timestamp )

Use a fixed serialization order and include a human-readable summary in the RCS message. The digest must be presented to the signer UI so the signer verifies the human summary matches the cryptographic digest before signing.

3) Provision device-bound attestation keys

Each signer device should have two keys:

  • Signing key: ideally the wallet’s private key for approval signing. For security, many teams use a separate device approval key (ed25519) that signs the approval but is not the on-chain key.
  • Attestation key: provisioned by the app at install and anchored to platform attestation (Play Integrity / Apple DeviceCheck). The attestation proves the app binary and device context are genuine.

The backend verifies attestation before accepting a confirmation signature. For the highest assurance, use HSM-backed key storage or platform keystore (Android Keystore / Secure Enclave) to protect the attestation private key.

4) Build the RCS confirmation UX and payload

Design the RCS message so it is actionable and minimizes ambiguity:

  • Include a short summary: NFT collection, tokenId, price (USD + native), recipient address short-form.
  • Include explicit human-readable risk checklist: "This will transfer token #1234 to 0xAbc... within 10 minutes. Gas estimate: 0.02 ETH."
  • Attach CTA buttons: "Approve" and "Reject" as RCS suggested replies.
  • Embed the canonical digest hash (shortened) and an opt-in "View details" link that opens the wallet app with the full payload.

Example RCS payload (JSON blob attached to the message):

{
  "digest": "0x8f7a...",
  "summary": "Transfer BAYC #1234 to 0xAbc... for 150 ETH",
  "expires_at": 1700000000,
  "chainId": 1,
  "contract": "0x...",
  "tokenId": "1234"
}

5) Enforce E2EE and verify message provenance

Where RCS E2EE is available (MLS-based flows), ensure your gateway negotiates E2EE sessions and that the signer app verifies message integrity and sender branding. For platforms where RCS E2EE is not yet available (some carriers/OS combos), force fallback to the wallet app's encrypted push channel or to Signal/another audited channel. Never send approvals over plain SMS.

6) Local confirmation, biometric check, and signing

When the signer taps "Approve" in RCS, the wallet app must:

  1. Open the attached payload using an intent or deep link (prevents spoofed messages that lack the payload).
  2. Show the canonical transaction summary and the truncated digest to the user.
  3. Require a local biometric or PIN unlock and then sign the digest with the device signing key.
  4. Attach the device attestation and a signature counter/timestamp to the approval and send it back to the backend over an authenticated TLS channel.

7) Backend verification: signatures, attestation, and freshness

The backend must perform these checks before accepting an approval:

  • Verify the approval signature against the signer's registered public key.
  • Validate device attestation with the platform provider (Play Integrity / DeviceCheck) to ensure the wallet binary and device state are intact.
  • Check signature counter + timestamp to prevent replay; ensure the digest matches the pending transaction and is not expired.
  • Log the approval and append the signed payload to the audit vault (encrypted).

8) Aggregation and execution

Depending on your custody architecture:

  • For smart-contract multisig (e.g., Gnosis Safe) collect off-chain signatures (eth_signTypedData/EIP-712) and then call execTransaction to execute when threshold reached.
  • For Threshold ECDSA (TSS) setups, use the collected device attestations to trigger the TSS coordinator or HSM to produce the final on-chain signature without exposing the private key material.
  • For hybrid custody, the backend can submit the transaction using a Hot Wallet only after verifying all approvals and after a final HSM-backed policy check.

Practical payload and verification pseudocode

Below is a concise algorithmic flow showing the digest creation, signer flow, and verification steps (pseudocode):

// On Transaction Service
payload = serialize(chainId,contract,tokenId,value,recipient,gas,nonce,timestamp)
digest = keccak256("RCS-V1" + payload)
sendRcsMessage(signerPhone, {digest, summary, deepLink})

// On Signer Device when user taps Approve
if (verifyUserBiometric()) {
  signature = sign(deviceKey, digest)
  attestation = getPlatformAttestation(deviceKey)
  sendApprovalToBackend({signature, attestation, signerId, counter, timestamp})
}

// Backend verification
if (!verifySignature(signerPublicKey, signature, digest)) reject()
if (!verifyAttestation(attestation)) reject()
if (isReplay(counter,timestamp)) reject()
recordApproval(signerId, signature, attestation)
if (approvals >= threshold) executeTransaction()

DAO-specific considerations

DAOs add complexity: signers may rotate, proposals are public, and governance modules need traceability:

  • On-chain anchor: once approvals are collected, write a small anchor (e.g., a hashed approval bundle) on-chain for non-repudiation and auditability. This helps in disputes.
  • Proposal IDs: include a governance proposalId in the digest so approvals can be scoped to one proposal and cannot be used elsewhere.
  • Signer rotation: store signer public keys off-chain with versioning and require re-attestation on key rotation.

Fallbacks, resilience and UX polish

RCS E2EE adoption is not universal in 2026. Carriers and OS vendors are still rolling out MLS-based E2EE. Build robust fallbacks and frictionless UX:

  • Fallback channels: Secure push notifications, in-app approval, or Signal. Fallback should be auditable and maintain the same attestation requirements.
  • Progressive disclosure: For smaller transfers, allow 1-click approvals; force biometric + attestation for big sums.
  • Rate limiting: Protect against flood attempts; require cool-downs or out-of-band verification after suspicious activity.
  • Human-in-the-loop for emergencies: If device attestation fails for more than X% of signers, trigger an emergency multisig process that requires physical verification.

Logging, audit trails and tax compliance

For compliance and tax purposes, keep an immutable and privacy-preserving audit trail:

  • Store signed approval bundles (digest + approval signatures + attestations) encrypted using a key under DAO governance.
  • Timestamp approvals with a trusted time source and keep transaction receipts after execution.
  • Provide auditors with redacted views or time-limited decryption keys to inspect approvals.

Security checklist before production

Run this checklist as part of your go-live readiness:

  1. Formal threat model and attack surface review.
  2. Independent penetration test of the wallet app, backend and RCS gateway integration.
  3. Device attestation validation tests across Android/iOS/carriers with E2EE and non-E2EE fallbacks.
  4. Replay and race condition tests for signature counters and expiries.
  5. Key rotation and breach recovery drill, including signer revocation and emergency multisig policies.

Advanced strategies and future-proofing

To stay secure as protocols evolve, adopt these advanced patterns:

  • Threshold keying (TSS): Move toward TSS so the on-chain key never exists in one place. TSS schemes for secp256k1 are mature enough for production; they reduce single-point-of-failure risk.
  • Selective disclosure proofs: Use zero-knowledge proofs for on-chain anchors to prove a threshold was reached without revealing signer identities publicly.
  • Attestation chaining: Create a signed chain that links the device attestation to the user identity, to the DAO membership registry, and to the proposal.
  • Continuous monitoring: Watch for fraudulent number porting / SIM swaps and block approvals from recently changed numbers until re-attested.

Real-world example (illustrative)

Scenario: A DAO is selling a blue-chip NFT at 120 ETH. Policy requires 4-of-7 approvals for sales >100 ETH.

  1. Seller initiates the sale; backend constructs the transfer payload and computes digest.
  2. The transaction service sends RCS E2EE messages to 7 signer devices with the digest and deep links.
  3. 4 signers approve via RCS; their devices sign the digest, attach Play Integrity attestations, and send them back to the backend.
  4. Backend verifies signatures and attestations, records the approvals in the audit vault, and calls Gnosis Safe execTransaction using the aggregated EIP-712 signatures.
  5. On-chain execution finalizes the transfer; the backend writes a short anchor (hash of approvals) to the DAO’s governance contract for future proof.

Known limitations & mitigations

Be aware of these pragmatic limitations in 2026:

  • RCS E2EE availability varies by carrier/OS. Mitigation: build reliable fallback channels with identical attestation requirements.
  • Device compromise still possible. Mitigation: use multi-factor approvals and require HSM-level confirmations for the highest tiers.
  • Privacy vs audit trade-offs. Mitigation: encrypt audit logs and use on-chain anchors that reveal minimal information.

Regulatory and compliance notes

RCS confirmations form part of your audit trail. Depending on jurisdiction, recordkeeping rules may require retention of signed approvals for multiple years. For high-value institutional custody, ensure your approach aligns with AML/KYC and record retention obligations. Work with counsel to ensure attestation records are admissible where required.

Final recommendations

  • Use RCS E2EE where available, but design secure fallbacks; never depend solely on carrier guarantees.
  • Cryptographically bind confirmations to a canonical digest and verify device attestations.
  • Prefer TSS or HSM-backed execution for the highest-value NFTs to remove single key failure points.
  • Keep an encrypted audit vault tied to on-chain anchors to provide tamper-evident records for audits and tax purposes.
"Adding RCS E2EE to multi-sig workflows doesn't automatically secure a process — but when combined with device attestation, canonical digests and threshold signing, it gives teams a secure, user-friendly channel for human approvals." — crypts.site engineering

Actionable takeaways

  • Start by defining approval thresholds and canonical digest format for your NFT flows.
  • Provision device-bound keys and attestations; require biometric unlock for approvals.
  • Implement RCS E2EE where supported and fall back to encrypted push or Signal when necessary.
  • Log signed approvals in an encrypted audit vault and anchor a proof on-chain.
  • Test the full end-to-end path across carriers and device types before moving high-value assets.

Call to action

If your team or DAO is preparing to transact high-value NFTs, download our RCS Multi-Sig Integration Checklist and sample EIP-712 schemas, or schedule a security review with crypts.site engineers. Implement the strong, auditable approval flows described here before your next major transfer — the next attack is only one careless confirmation away.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#multi-sig#RCS#DAO
c

crypts

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-02-03T16:12:58.369Z